Program Administration Introduction
Purpose
Service delivery practices guide the administration of safe, effective programs that respect personal dignity and self-determination.Introduction
Note: Please see the PA-PRG Reference List for the research that informed the development of these standards.
Note: Program Administration is a new section in the 2020 Edition that includes content previously contained in other sections. Please see the PA-RPM Crosswalk, the CR Crosswalk, and the PA-PDS Crosswalk for more information.
Program Administration (PA-PRG) 1: Case Records
- identify the individual or family being served;
- support decisions about interventions or services; and
- document the delivery of services.
NA The agency is only assigned the Early Childhood Education (PA-ECE), Out-of-School Time Services (PA-OST), and/or Community Change Initiatives (PA-CCI) standards.
NA The agency provides only non-clinical group, crisis intervention, and/or information and referral services.
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
Note: Please see the PRG Reference List for the research that informed the development of these standards.
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.
- All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions: exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance.
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement.
- The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.
- Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.
- The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.
- Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner.
- Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.
- Capacity is at a basic level.
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.
- The agency’s observed administration and management infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.
PA-PRG 1.01
PA-PRG 1.02
- demographic and contact information;
- the reason for requesting or being referred for services;
- up-to-date assessments;
- the service plan including mutually developed goals and objectives;
- copies of all signed consent forms;
- a description of services provided directly or by referral;
- routine documentation of ongoing services;
- documentation of routine supervisory review;
- discharge or aftercare plan;
- recommendations for ongoing and/or future service needs and assignment of aftercare or follow-up responsibility, if needed; and
- a closing summary entered within 30 days of termination of service.
Interpretation: Regarding element (h),"documentation of routine supervisory review" refers to the quarterly review of individual cases that is found in the Service Planning and Monitoring sections of most Service Standards. This review is unrelated to Supervision between the supervisor and personnel addressed in PA-PDS 4.
Interpretation: Case records and signatures can be paper, electronic, or a combination of paper and electronic.
CFS Interpretation: For agencies providing child and family services, element (d) also includes permanency plans for every child who is currently in out-of-home care or has been in care in the last 12 months.
EAP Interpretation: In Employee Assistance Programs, case records contain appropriate information to demonstrate the status of the case and whether it is open or closed.
DV Interpretation: When domestic violence services are provided, documentation in case records should be limited to essential information. Personnel should be conscious of the language they choose, avoid unnecessary detail, and refrain from editorializing or recording opinions.
PA-PRG 1.03
- orders for and results of psychological, medical, toxicological, diagnostic, or other evaluations;
- documentation of all prescribed and over-the-counter medications including copies of all written orders for medications, when applicable;
- special treatment procedures, allergies, or adverse treatment responses; and
- court reports, documents of guardianship or legal custody, birth or marriage certificates, and any legal directives related to the service being provided.
- engage prescribers and other partnering providers in corrective action when concerns are noted; and
- advocate for increased availability and use of appropriate, non-pharmacological interventions.
PA-PRG 1.04
- specific, factual, relevant, and legible;
- kept up to date from intake through case closing;
- completed, signed, and dated by the person who provided the service; and
- signed and dated by supervisors, where appropriate.
- verify the individual's identity and ensure that each electronic signature is unique to the individual; and
- ensure that the signature will remain tied or connected to the content being signed for as long as the record is maintained.
Examples of ways to verify the authenticity of digital signatures when using electronic records include, but are not limited to: a digitalized signature via tablet or two identifying components such as a user identification code (ID) and password/personal identification number (PIN).
PA-PRG 1.05
- at least quarterly; or
- monthly for individuals receiving protective services, out-of-home care, day treatment, or frequent or intensive counseling or treatment.
PA-PRG 1.06
- for at least seven years after case closing for adults;
- until the age of majority or seven years after case closing, whichever is longer, for minors; and
- disposes of case records in a manner that protects privacy and confidentiality in the event of the agency's dissolution.
Program Administration (PA-PRG) 2: Access to Case Records
NA The organization is only assigned the Early Childhood Education (PA-ECE), Out-of-School Time Services (PA-OST), and/or Community Change Initiatives (PA-CCI) standards.
NA The agency provides only non-clinical group, crisis intervention, and/or information and referral services.
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.
- All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions: exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance.
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement.
- The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.
- Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.
- The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.
- Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner.
- Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.
- Capacity is at a basic level.
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.
- The agency’s observed administration and management infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.
PA-PRG 2.01
- the service recipient or, as appropriate, a parent or legal guardian;
- personnel authorized to access specific information on a “need-to-know” basis;
- former service recipients;
- requests for records of deceased service recipients; and
- auditors, contractors, and licensing or accrediting personnel consistent with the agency’s confidentiality policy.
Note: Please see the Facility Observation Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
PA-PRG 2.02
- reviews are conducted in the presence of professional personnel on the agency’s premises;
- reviews are carried out in a manner that protects the confidentiality of family members and others whose information may be contained in the record;
- any personnel responses to service recipient additions are added with the service recipient’s knowledge; and
- the service recipient is given the opportunity to review and comment on personnel responses.
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
PA-PRG 2.03
- senior management reviews, approves in writing, and enters into the case record the reasons for refusal; and
- procedures permit a qualified professional to review records on behalf of service recipients, provided the professional signs a statement that information determined to be harmful will be withheld.
NA Applicable law prohibits limiting a person’s access to their case record for any reason.
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
Program Administration (PA-PRG) 3: Medication Control and Administration
The agency ensures safe, uniform medication control and administration.
Interpretation: PA-PRG 3.01- PA-PRG 3.07 do not apply to resource family homes or adult foster care homes. See PA-CFS 24.04 or PA-AFC 7.02 for medication training and administration requirements for resource parents or adult foster care caregivers.
Note: When an agency’s medication management activities are limited to administering naloxone in the event of an opioid overdose, the NA at PA-PRG 3 applies. See PA-ASE 6.03 for more information on training and procedures related to treating opioid overdose.
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.
- All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions: exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance.
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement.
- The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.
- Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.
- The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.
- Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner.
- Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.
- Capacity is at a basic level.
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.
- The agency’s observed administration and management infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.
PA-PRG 3.01
Interpretation: Physicians who prescribe and dispense approved buprenorphine products for opioid addiction are appropriately credentialed by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and provide treatment in accordance with DEA policy.
Interpretation: Programs, such as shelters and safe homes, that allow service recipients to store medications in a safe, lockable personal space (e.g., individual lock boxes or private use lockers) should train staff in the agency’s medication management procedures, including the proper handling and disposal of medications.
PA-PRG 3.02
- medication name;
- dose;
- reason for use;
- how to administer;
- desired effects; and
- potential side effects.
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
PA-PRG 3.03
- qualified personnel obtain and/or update information about the medications the individual is taking at each visit; and
- the prescribing clinician compares current medications the individual is taking at each visit, including vitamins or other non-prescription medications, with new or changed medication orders to identify possible adverse interaction of medications.
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
PA-PRG 3.04
Procedures for the proper administration of medication address:
- maintaining a record of who received medications, what medications were dispensed or administered, and when and by whom medications were dispensed or administered;
- administration of over-the-counter medications; and
- safe dispensing or administering of sample medications, in accordance with law and regulation.
NA The agency does not dispense or administer medication.
PA-PRG 3.05
Procedures for the proper storage of medication address:
- locked, supervised storage with access limited to authorized personnel and in accordance with law, regulation, and manufacturer's instruction;
- maintaining medication in original packaging and labeling with the name of the service recipient, medication name, dosage, prescribing physician name, and number or code identifying the written order; and
- appropriate disposal of expired or unused medication, syringes, medical waste, or medication prescribed to former service recipients.
Interpretation: Storage of medication in a secure, central location with access by authorized personnel only is an effective risk management measure and best practice. However, COA Accreditation recognizes that some programs, such as shelters and safe homes, allow service recipients to store medications in a safe, lockable personal space (e.g., individual lock boxes or private use lockers). In these instances, agencies can demonstrate implementation of the standard by providing protocols, procedures or other documents that demonstrate that they have acknowledged the potential risks of this method and subsequently taken appropriate measures to minimize those risks.
Agencies also need to clearly communicate that service recipients are personally responsible for administering and storing their own medications. Intake processes should stipulate what service recipients are allowed to store in their secure, personal space and assign responsibility of the space to the individual to support this approach to storing medication.
NA The agency does not store medication.
Note: Please see the Facility Observation Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
PA-PRG 3.06
- the identity of the individual and the medication ordered;
- that the medication to be administered matches the medication order; and
- the integrity of the medication through visual inspection.
PA-PRG 3.07
PA-PRG 3.08
- engages prescribers and other partnering providers in corrective action when concerns are noted; and
- advocates for increased availability and use of non-pharmacological interventions.
- ensuring prescribing providers are familiar with child and adolescent trauma symptoms; and
- establishing a team- or peer-based prescribing model.
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
Program Administration (PA-PRG) 4: Technology-Based Service Delivery
Terms that are often used to refer to the delivery of services via technologies include, but are not limited to: telehealth, teleservices, telepractice, telemental health, telepsychiatry, mHealth, online therapy, distance counseling, internet- or web-based interventions, telephonic services, and digital services.
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.
- All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions: exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance.
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement.
- The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.
- Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.
- The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.
- Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner.
- Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.
- Capacity is at a basic level.
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.
- The agency’s observed administration and management infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.
PA-PRG 4.01
- privacy and security measures specific to the service delivery model;
- the use of acceptable technologies, including personnel-owned devices if applicable; and
- collecting, storing, tracking, and transmitting information gathered electronically.
PA-PRG 4.02
- assesses the appropriateness of technology-based service delivery based on the individual's preferences, established criteria, and suitability factors;
- monitors whether or not the service delivery model is effective; and
- arranges for services to be delivered in person when necessary.
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
PA-PRG 4.03
- the service provider’s physical location, contact information, and credentials;
- alternate methods of service delivery, including access to other service providers, in the event of a technological failure;
- privacy and confidentiality limitations associated with electronic communication;
- instructions on how to access services and use the technologies;
- risks and benefits associated with the service delivery model;
- emergency response procedures including verifying the person's current location for the purposes of emergency management;
- how personal information and data will be documented, stored, protected, and used; and
- under what conditions a referral for face-to-face services may be made.
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
PA-PRG 4.04
- use of equipment and software as appropriate to their position and the services provided;
- privacy and confidentiality issues specific to the service delivery model;
- recognizing and responding to emergency or crisis situations from a remote location; and
- engaging and building rapport with service recipients when communicating electronically.
- set up;
- features;
- maintenance;
- safety and security measures; and
- responding to technical matters (e.g., maintenance issues and troubleshooting) directly or by contacting the appropriate parties for assistance.
PA-PRG 4.05
Program Administration (PA-PRG) 5: Services for Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Children, youth, and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities receive inclusive services that help them achieve full integration, make choices, exert control over their lives, and fully participate in, and contribute to, their communities.
NA The agency does not provide any programs or services focused on serving persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
NA The agency is implementing the standards for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Services (PA-IDDS).
Currently viewing: SERVICES FOR PERSONS WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
VIEW THE STANDARDS
Note: Please see the Case Record Checklist for additional guidance on this standard.
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.
- All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions: exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance.
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement.
- The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.
- Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.
- The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.
- Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner.
- Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.
- Capacity is at a basic level.
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.
- The agency’s observed administration and management infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.
PA-PRG 5.01
Service planning topics for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities can include, but are not limited to:
- health and safety issues;
- degree of supervision needed;
- independent living, social, and daily living skills;
- dietary needs;
- leisure and vocational interests and aptitudes and the need for greater social inclusion;
- screening and treatment for co-occurring psychiatric disorders or substance use conditions;
- the need for assistive technology, auxiliary aids, and other special accommodations;
- positive behavior support planning;
- medication needs;
- issues related to adaptive, behavior, and cognitive functioning including concrete and abstract reasoning;
- specialized supports such as physical, speech, and occupational therapy;
- ancillary services;
- end of life planning; and
- the need for hospice or palliative care.
PA-PRG 5.02
- the agency can document its reasons for believing that the intervention will be beneficial to the person served;
- the person has been fully informed about the risks and benefits of the intervention and has consented to it;
- the intervention is prescribed by a qualified medical practitioner or recommended by an interdisciplinary team, and specific parameters for use of the intervention, such as time limits and clear criteria for when the intervention should be applied, have been established;
- the agency periodically reviews the continued need for and effectiveness of the treatment or intervention; and
- the intervention is not used as a substitute for appropriate staffing patterns, for the convenience of personnel, or as punishment.
PA-PRG 5.03
- involved in the selection of specific technologies;
- afforded the opportunity to try the device prior to purchase or assignment; and
- trained on the use of specific assistive devices being provided.
PA-PRG 5.04
- helping them identify and pursue the types of social roles and relationships they wish to pursue;
- providing opportunities for social and physical interaction with people, other than service providers and other service recipients; and
- helping them achieve an optimal level of community involvement and participation.
PA-PRG 5.05
- strengthen the family's ability to provide care;
- prevent unwanted and inappropriate out-of-home placements;
- help resolve conflicts between the person and his/her family, advocate, or others involved in establishing and implementing the person's plan; and
- help maintain family unity.
Examples of community support services include, but are not limited to: behavioral support, case management, counseling, early intervention services, financial assistance, in-home support, public entitlements, respite services, and support groups.
PA-PRG 5.06
- sexual health and development;
- family planning;
- prevention of STDs and HIV/AIDS; and
- sexual abuse and exploitation including giving and receiving sexual consent.
Program Administration (PA-PRG) 6: Personnel Training for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Services
Personnel who provide direct services to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are trained and able to provide services, supports, and other forms of direct assistance.
NA The agency does not provide any programs or services focused on serving persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
NA The agency is implementing the standards for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Services (IDDS).
A rating of (1) indicates that the agency's practices fully meet the standard and reflect a high level of capacity.
- All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, with rare or no exceptions: exceptions do not impact service quality or agency performance.
A rating of (2) indicates that an agency's infrastructure and practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement.
- The majority of the standards requirements have been met and the basic framework required by the standard has been implemented.
- Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality or agency performance.
Partial Implementation, Concerning Performance
A rating of (3) indicates that the agency's observed infrastructure and/or practices require significant improvement.
- The agency has not implemented the basic framework of the standard but instead has in place only part of this framework.
- Omissions or exceptions to the practices outlined in the standard occur regularly, or practices are implemented in a cursory or haphazard manner.
- Service quality or agency functioning may be compromised.
- Capacity is at a basic level.
A rating of (4) indicates that implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all.
- The agency’s observed administration and management infrastructure and practices are weak or non-existent; or show signs of neglect, stagnation, or deterioration.
PA-PRG 6.01
- assisted dining techniques and good nutrition;
- lifting and transfer techniques;
- safe transportation techniques;
- health related supports;
- use of assistive technology; and
- teaching ADLs.
PA-PRG 6.02
- the parameters under which interventions may be used;
- the proper and safe use of chosen interventions; and
- the potential for re-traumatization.